If you create content—whether it’s YouTube tutorials, podcasts, or just Loom updates for your team—you know the pain. It’s called “Editing Jail.” You record for 30 minutes, but only 10 minutes is actually usable content. The rest? It’s just you breathing, thinking, or saying “um” while looking for a browser tab.
Manually cutting those awkward silences isn’t just boring; it kills your creative flow. That’s where CyberCut comes in. It promises to automate the most tedious part of video editing so you can focus on the fun stuff.
What is CyberCut Actually?
Think of CyberCut as your automated assistant editor who does the rough cut for you. It analyzes your video (or audio) file, identifies the silences and dead air, and chops them out instantly.
It’s not trying to replace high-end editors like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve initially. Instead, it’s designed to be the first step in your workflow. You throw your raw footage in, it trims the fat, and you get a clean, snappy video ready for final polish. For many creators, this alone saves hours of scrolling through a timeline.
Who is Behind CyberCut?
Unlike many solo-dev projects we see on Product Hunt, CyberCut has a full squad behind it. It’s a collaborative effort involving a mix of engineers, product managers, and marketing pros.
The team includes Yanan Lian, Tiange Tan, and Guolong Zhao (Product Manager). They are backed by a wider crew including Ericabear, Jason Hu, xin zhao (FE Engineer), Ning LIU, HAOBO WANG, and Simba Lee. It’s refreshing to see a diverse team tackling this, combining technical engineering with actual product management.
What is the Community Saying?
Let’s be real—it is still early days for CyberCut. As of now, the community feedback is cautious.
On Product Hunt, the project currently holds a 3.0 out of 5 stars rating based on early feedback. This “middle-of-the-road” score usually signals that while the core idea is solid (everyone hates editing silence), the execution might still be in the MVP (Minimum Viable Product) phase. Early adopters should expect some bugs or a slightly rough user interface. It’s not a polished diamond yet, but the potential is definitely there.
CyberCut vs. The Competition
There are a few players in the “AI video trimmer” space now. Here is how CyberCut stacks up against the big dogs like Descript or TimeBolt:
| Feature | CyberCut | Descript | Manual Editing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Vibe | “Fast & Simple Trimming” | “Full Audio/Video Word Processor” | “Painful” |
| Learning Curve | Near Zero (Upload & Go) | Medium (Lots of features) | High |
| Processing Speed | Fast (Cloud based) | Depends on project size | Slowest |
Pricing
CyberCut typically operates on a credit-based or subscription model, which is standard for cloud processing tools (since GPU usage isn’t cheap).
- Free Trial: They typically offer a free trial (often the first video or a specific minute limit) so you can see if the “magic” actually works for your style.
- Subscription: Expect monthly plans that scale with the hours of video you upload. Compared to hiring a freelance editor on Upwork ($20-$50/hour), the subscription pays for itself in one video.
Final Thoughts
Is it perfect? The mixed initial reviews suggest it has room to grow. But getting a 90% done rough cut in 2 minutes is infinitely better than doing it manually in 2 hours. If you value your time and are willing to test out a new tool, give it a shot.
✂️ Check it out on Product Hunt: CyberCut Launch Page
🌐 Official Website: cybercut.ai
